Subject: Letter from Senator Edwards and Secretary Kemp [to President Bush re: Russian NGO Legislation]
From: Rositsa Petrova (email@example.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005
Dear Mr. Johnson:
We would like to ask you to post a copy of the letter that Senator John Edwards and Secretary Jack Kemp sent to President Bush about the NGO legislation introduced recently in the Russian State Duma. The legislation would, among other things, keep foreign NGO's from maintaining "representative offices" or branches in Russia and deny foreign funds to Russian organizations that engage in (undefined) "political" activities. Senator Edwards and Secretary Kemp are co-chairs of the Council on Foreign Relations Independent Task Force on U.S. Policy toward Russia.
I have attached a pdf file of the signed letter and an electronic version of the letter (unsigned) because I am not sure what format will work best for your e-mail list.
We appreciate your help. Please let me know when you post it and feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Research Associate, Russian and Eurasian Studies
Council on Foreign Relations
1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Tel (202) 518-3421
Fax (202) 986-2984
Council on Foreign Relations
Independent Task Force on U.S. Policy Toward Russia
November 15, 2005
The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
Last spring the Council on Foreign Relations asked the two of us to serve as co-chairs of an independent task force on U.S. policy toward Russia. The group has met several times over the past six months and is preparing a report to be issued early next year. As sometimes happens in the course of such a broad review, an individual issue emerges that is so timely and about which task force members feel so strongly that the co-chairs decide to make early contact with policymakers to express their views. We are writing you now on just such a question a disturbing new challenge to the ability of Russian non-governmental organizations to cooperate with, and draw support from counterparts in the United States and elsewhere. We believe this issue urgently needs discussion when you meet with President Putin this week.
As you may know, members of President Putin’s party and other fractions of the State Duma introduced legislation last week that would, among other things, keep foreign NGO’s from maintaining “representative offices” or branches in Russia and deny foreign funds to Russian organizations that engage in (undefined) “political” activities. Virtually the entire non-profit sector from human-rights monitors to policy think-tanks, even public-health alliances is likely to be affected.
The impact of this measure, if it became law, should be obvious: it would roll back pluralism in Russia and curtail contact between our societies. It would mark a complete breach of the commitment to strengthen such contact that President Putin made when you and he met in Bratislava on February 24, 2005. And it raises an almost unthinkable prospect that the president of Russia might serve as chairman of the G-8 at the same time that laws come into force in his country to choke off contacts with global society.
This piece of legislation is all the more disturbing to us because it does not come out of nowhere. It is part of the clear negative pattern of growing state control over society, about which you and Secretary Rice have properly raised America’s concern. The creation of modern political, social, and economic institutions in Russia is a truly historic process, and both countries will be the losers if it is cut short.
Russian officials and legislators are, of course, likely to insist that they are doing no more than blocking political interference in their internal affairs. Even with its unsettling echoes of Soviet times, we recognize this as a legitimate interest. But if the only issue were how to protect the integrity of Russia’s electoral process and political campaigns, the problem would be easily solved. Other countries, including our own, do so without encroaching on fundamental freedoms.
The aim of the proposed legislation, to judge by the way its sponsors talk about it, is clearly far broader. Senior Russian officials have described their own NGO’s as a “fifth column” in Russian society and even as fronts for foreign intelligence services. If this proposal comes into force, the government will clearly have in its hands the authority to close down public organizations simply because it finds their views and activities inconvenient.
Mr. President, Russia faces a choice between putting itself in the mainstream of the modern world or getting trapped in an eddy of reaction and isolation. For those of us and here we can confidently include all members of our task force who support the goal of Russian-American partnership, the legislation that the Duma is considering represents a very serious warning about how that choice is being made.
We hope you will use your meeting with President Putin to discuss this matter in the frankest possible terms.