| JRL HOME | SUPPORT | SUBSCRIBE | RESEARCH & ANALYTICAL SUPPLEMENT | |
Old Saint Basil's Cathedral in MoscowJohnson's Russia List title and scenes of Saint Petersburg
Excerpts from the JRL E-Mail Community :: Founded and Edited by David Johnson

#13
ANALYSIS-Russia faces dilemma as U.S. girds forces
By Richard Balmforth

MOSCOW, Sept 17 (Reuters) - A U.S. call on its friends to stand up and be 
counted as it girds itself for military action over last week's terror 
attacks has confronted Russia with an awkward policy choice. 

How can it deliver on pledges to join a global fight against terrorism -- but 
stay out of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan that will harm its 
influence in the region? 

Can Russia afford to be neutral in any U.S.-led action near its region of 
strategic interest while preserving its big-power image in former Soviet 
territory? 

And -- crucially for President Vladimir Putin -- can he steer a middle course 
without endangering an embryonic relationship with the administration of 
George W. Bush? 

"Russia at the moment is trying to preserve neutrality. But the war will be 
carried out according to the principle 'He who is not with us, is against 
us,"' the newspaper Vedomosti wrote on Monday, zeroing in on Putin's 
quandary. 

Drawing up a plus and minus sheet, Vedomosti said a consequence of staying 
out of a western coalition of action would be foreign policy isolation for 
Russia in the West. 

CONFLICTING SIGNALS FROM PUTIN 

Putin was one of the first world leaders to offer condolences to the United 
States following the September 11 attacks. The tragedy, he said, underscored 
Russian proposals for a global war to defeat "the plague" of terrorism. 

The head of Russia's SVR foreign intelligence service, taking the cue, said 
his service was working closely with agencies in the United States, Europe 
and the Middle East to prevent new terror acts. 

The U.S. focus on Taliban-ruled Afghanistan as one of the main springs of 
international terrorism identified a common enemy. 

Moscow has long held the same view, seeing the hand of the hardline Muslim 
Taliban and that of Saudi-born militant Osama bin Laden -- prime suspect in 
the U.S. terror attacks -- in the separatist rebellion in Chechnya. 

But as attention swivelled to the ex-Soviet republics of Central Asia as 
possible launch-pads for U.S. and NATO operations in Afghanistan the Russian 
position hardened. 

At stake for Putin here is Moscow's influence in the cluster of former 
Central Asian states, which belong to the Russian-led Commonwealth of 
Independent States and which form a vast strategic buffer region along 
Russia's south-eastern borders. 

It was left to Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov to quash speculation that 
Moscow would allow Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, both of which border 
Afghanistan, to be used as springboards for NATO military operations against 
the Taliban. 

"I don't see any basis for even hypothetical assumptions of the possibility 
of launching any NATO military operations in the territory of Central Asian 
countries which are members of the CIS," Ivanov told reporters in Armenia 
last Friday. 

At first glance, it seems improbable that Tajikistan, whose border security 
is guaranteed by Russian forces under a government agreement, would strike a 
deal with Washington and open its territory for logistical support to U.S. 
forces. 

The Washington Post reported on Monday that Uzbekistan however was prepared 
to discuss use of its bases and air space with the United States, but a 
government spokesman later back-pedalled saying it was too early to say. 

Putin, facing what might turn into his biggest foreign policy challenge yet, 
has put out conflicting signals over what Moscow's reaction would be to 
large-scale U.S. military operations against targets in Afghanistan. 

Saying the "evil" of terror actions had to be punished, the Kremlin leader 
cautiously added on Saturday: "We should not liken ourselves to bandits who 
strike from behind. We must weigh up our decisions and make them on the basis 
of proven facts." 

FEAR OF U.S. INFLUENCE IN CENTRAL ASIA 

Russia's political establishment meanwhile began to show signs of increasing 
nervousness on Monday at the implications of U.S. military action in 
Afghanistan. 

U.S. action could so destabilise the situation in Central Asia that Russia 
"might be deprived of its zones of influence in the region" Sergei 
Zagidullin, deputy chairman of the parliamentary committee for international 
affairs, told RIA Novist news agency. 

The decision of Uzbekistan to give up its air space to the United States 
"placed Russia in a difficult situation," he said. 

Cooperation with a U.S. operation launched from Russia's backyard could also 
give Putin huge problems with his own armed forces, analysts say. 

"Having got access into the Russian sphere of influence in Central Asia, the 
Americans could hang on there," Vedomosti said, voicing a fear certain to be 
shared by Russia's generals. 

At the same time, Putin, who has sought to avoid confrontation with the 
United States on several issues, may find it impossible to steer a middle 
course indefinitely. 

"Either way, with or without Russian backing for U.S. operations, there will 
be instability in the region," independent analyst Alexander Golts said on 
Monday. 

"The difficulty for Russia will be in its relations with the United States 
which is saying 'Either you are our allies or you are with our enemies'. 
There is no third way," said Golts.

 
Back to the Top    Next Section